Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Bulletin of Alexandria Faculty of Medicine. 2006; 42 (3): 747-756
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-172799

ABSTRACT

Management of malignant jaundice is frequently a real challenge. Most patients present in advanced stages of the disease, and usually there are co-morbidities. Some investigations may not be diagnostic or conclusive. There are controversies about the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for jaundice. Surgical intervention and percutaneous biliary drainage are two lines of treatment with much controversy. Of this work was to assess the controversies in the management of malignant obstructive jaundice as regards benefits, drawbacks and basis of selection of surgical intervention versus percutaneous biliary drainage. 37 patients were included in this study. Detailed medical history, clinical examination and complete y laboratory and imaging investigations for the hepato-biliaiy tract were done. Decision of treatment was guided by the data of the patients, stage and extent of the disease, expected morbidity of the procedure and expected prognosis. 23 males and 14 females with mean age 58.6 +/- 17.4 years were studied. Diagnosis of the studied patients included 17 [45.9%] patients with pancreatic head carcinoma, 12 [32.4%] patients with cholangiocarcinoma, 6 [16.2%] patients with periampullary tumours, one [2.7%] patient with intrahepatic metastatic tumour one [2.7%] patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. Resectable tumours were found in 4 [10.8%] patients, while unresectable tumours were found in 33 [89.2%] patients. The treatment of the patients included surgical intervention for 14 [37.8%] patients and percutaneous biliary drainage for 23 [62.1%] patients. The mean survival duration was 11 +/- 4.8 months after resectional surgery, 6.5 +/- 2.4 months after palliative surgical bypass, while it was 4.7 +/- 1.2 months after percutaneous biliary drainage. Selection of therapeutic procedure was guided and individualized by the data of the patient. Whenever the tumour is operable, resectional surgery is the treatment of choice. However, in the majority of patients, the tumours were inoperable and treatment was palliative. Palliative surgical bypass was associated with less morbidity and longer survival than stenting, and was preferable for lower biliary obstruction. However, precutaneous biliary drainage was more suitable for hilar biliary obstruction. It can be the sole therapeutic procedure for jaundice of patients unfit for surgical intervention. Percutaneous biliary drainage was beneficial for patients with advanced inoperable tumours, with bad general conditions and deteriorated uncorrectable liver functions. It also included diagnostic cholangiography, especially 1 ERCP is not feasible, allowed internal/external drainage and the simultaneous positioning of several protheses


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/methods , Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL